Sunday brought a trip to Leiden and Den Haag. The Dutch rail service was its usual cheap and efficient self, and I had the unexpected pleasure of sharing a carriage with a group of young English men headed to the ferry at Hook of Holland after a cultural weekend in Amsterdam. Their conversation ranged across topics as diverse as the strength of the cannabis smoked, the excellence of the ’shrooms they consumed, the technical expertise of the women in the windows and the witty banter they engaged in with said women, the attractiveness (or otherwise) of the transvestite who ran their “hotel”, and the likelihood of their ferry capsizing in the North Sea (if there was a God . . .). Their forthright opinions were delivered in ringing tones and with the requisite amount of effin’ and blindin’, to the “delight” of the entire carriage. I’ve become accustomed to not understanding and therefore tuning out the conversations in Dutch around me; to be forced to listen to such strident and ignorant English was a real shock to the system.
I would have chastised them for not visiting the Rijksmuseum, but must shamefully admit that I haven’t made it there in the nearly five years I’ve lived here. Oh, the shame of it!
Tuesday, February 28, 2006
Time for a clear-out
Another office move is upon me – just between floors, but it involves packing up boxes of the detritus that’s accumulated during the two years since the last one. What do we have alongside the usual horde of post-its, note pads and pens?
One desk drawer contains: a pair of trainers, a pair of black trousers (in case I get wet on the way in), a t-shirt, an orange fire warden’s vest, 2 bottles of sunscreen, a roll of toilet paper, a pair of shoes, an engraved Tiffany writing case, some shoe polish (suitable for neither the trainers nor shoes therein), toothbrush and toothpaste, and a handbook of American idioms – carefully hidden from people who like to abuse them.
The other desk drawer contains: a sudoku book, 1 bottle of olive oil, 1 bottle of sesame salad dressing, 1 tube of mustard, 2 packs of microwave popcorn, 4 Caramacs, 3 types of green tea, a bag of Swedish crispbreads, a tub of sunflower seeds, a jar of pepper, dried onion sprinkles, a jar of sundried tomatoes, 2 packs of chewing gum, and box of blue and white muisjes (aniseed sweets), and a tin of cinnamon.
I am clearly a well-prepared, responsible person with underlying bulimic tendencies.
One desk drawer contains: a pair of trainers, a pair of black trousers (in case I get wet on the way in), a t-shirt, an orange fire warden’s vest, 2 bottles of sunscreen, a roll of toilet paper, a pair of shoes, an engraved Tiffany writing case, some shoe polish (suitable for neither the trainers nor shoes therein), toothbrush and toothpaste, and a handbook of American idioms – carefully hidden from people who like to abuse them.
The other desk drawer contains: a sudoku book, 1 bottle of olive oil, 1 bottle of sesame salad dressing, 1 tube of mustard, 2 packs of microwave popcorn, 4 Caramacs, 3 types of green tea, a bag of Swedish crispbreads, a tub of sunflower seeds, a jar of pepper, dried onion sprinkles, a jar of sundried tomatoes, 2 packs of chewing gum, and box of blue and white muisjes (aniseed sweets), and a tin of cinnamon.
I am clearly a well-prepared, responsible person with underlying bulimic tendencies.
Sunday, February 26, 2006
This is not your parents' Battlestar Galactica
Our lack of more Battlestar Galactica episodes means that the evenings stretch ahead of us, bleak and empty. In a desperate attempt to fill them, PJ suggested we watch the pilot of the original BG and, in a moment of weakness, I agreed. It's very . . . different. I don't just mean the hairstyles (feathered bangs! on men!!), the use of the same special effects shots time after time, or the hysterically bad acting -- although it is highly entertaining watching Lorne Green play Adama as a paranoid nutjob and Jane Seymour representing the daftest mother in the world (seriously, Sirena loses her son Boxey THREE times in the pilot episode alone!). Times and budgets have changed and we can't use the same standards to judge these things.
However, viewing BG 1978 and BG 2004 side by side confirms one of the theses in Steven Johnson's book, "Everything Bad Is Good For You"; TV has become far more complex and demanding of the viewer. The 1978 2-hour pilot is a straightforward run through the Cylon attack, the end of the colonies, finding a new planet, and walking into another Cylon attack. The handful of key characters are introduced and we take them at face value: Adama (paranoid nutjob); Apollo (uptight, moralistic "hero"), Starbuck (comedy value and ladies' man); Baltar (traitor); Sirena (Worst. Mother. Ever!); and a handful of women who are variously criers, screamers, or girlfriends. There are no back stories, no complicated facets to their personalities, no conflicts above and beyond the ones set out as surface stories. There are good warriors (and the daft women who love them) and bad Cylons: That's it.
Compare this with the 3-hour miniseries that kicked off the new BG -- the three grimmest hours of television I've ever watched. A vast array of characters are introduced, some old, some new. We now have a female Secretary of Education who becomes President after the 47 people ahead of her are wiped out; Starbuck and Boomer are both women (although the casting director did a remarkable job of hiring Katee Sackhof, who looks very similar to Dirk Benedict); Gaius Baltar is a top Colonial scientist who's being manipulated by a very sexy Cylon into betraying mankind; and on it goes. Characters have become more complex, their motivations and drivers briefly glimpsed in throwaway lines or vignettes. Every hour is packed with detailed stories that layer action on motivation on conflict, forcing the viewer to concentrate -- everything is relevant. Most importantly, perhaps, there is no such thing as "good" and "bad". Colonel Tigh is an alcoholic hardass; President Roslin is a sympathetic mother figure who can also chuck Cylons out of airlocks without a thought or cut dodgy political deals; and the Cylons have feelings. (When watching BG 1978, I was rooting for the Cylons to take out Jane Seymour, but that probably doesn't count.) Politics, religion, the role of the media in wartime -- all the issues so relevant to us today are explored through sci-fi. Best of all, there are no children (although I'd love to see BG 2004 reintroduce Muffet 2.0, the animatronic "daggit" -- not enough shows have comedy animals).
And Battlestar Galactica isn't the only example of hugely involving television. Lost, Arrested Devlopment, and 24, even Life On Mars and Footballers Wives from the UK, require the viewer to pay attention; the gun shown in the first season may not go off until the third season, but you'd better remember it. If Hollywood execs want to understand why their box office receipts are heading south, they should watch TV: How can their 2-hour movies compete with the richness of these shows? It's obvious why Peter Jackson needed 10 hours to tell The Lord of the Rings and 3 for King Kong. It's also why sequels have become so prevalent; you need the first film just to set up the back story and characters but the result is that these films feel so slow as the "plot proper" is squeezed into the final 20 minutes. Rare is the movie that can establish its characters in the first few minutes and then actually tell a story thereafter. (Compare Batman Begins with War of the Worlds to see this difference and Spielberg's story-telling abilities in action.)
MPAA: It's not downloading that's killing movies; it's television.
However, viewing BG 1978 and BG 2004 side by side confirms one of the theses in Steven Johnson's book, "Everything Bad Is Good For You"; TV has become far more complex and demanding of the viewer. The 1978 2-hour pilot is a straightforward run through the Cylon attack, the end of the colonies, finding a new planet, and walking into another Cylon attack. The handful of key characters are introduced and we take them at face value: Adama (paranoid nutjob); Apollo (uptight, moralistic "hero"), Starbuck (comedy value and ladies' man); Baltar (traitor); Sirena (Worst. Mother. Ever!); and a handful of women who are variously criers, screamers, or girlfriends. There are no back stories, no complicated facets to their personalities, no conflicts above and beyond the ones set out as surface stories. There are good warriors (and the daft women who love them) and bad Cylons: That's it.
Compare this with the 3-hour miniseries that kicked off the new BG -- the three grimmest hours of television I've ever watched. A vast array of characters are introduced, some old, some new. We now have a female Secretary of Education who becomes President after the 47 people ahead of her are wiped out; Starbuck and Boomer are both women (although the casting director did a remarkable job of hiring Katee Sackhof, who looks very similar to Dirk Benedict); Gaius Baltar is a top Colonial scientist who's being manipulated by a very sexy Cylon into betraying mankind; and on it goes. Characters have become more complex, their motivations and drivers briefly glimpsed in throwaway lines or vignettes. Every hour is packed with detailed stories that layer action on motivation on conflict, forcing the viewer to concentrate -- everything is relevant. Most importantly, perhaps, there is no such thing as "good" and "bad". Colonel Tigh is an alcoholic hardass; President Roslin is a sympathetic mother figure who can also chuck Cylons out of airlocks without a thought or cut dodgy political deals; and the Cylons have feelings. (When watching BG 1978, I was rooting for the Cylons to take out Jane Seymour, but that probably doesn't count.) Politics, religion, the role of the media in wartime -- all the issues so relevant to us today are explored through sci-fi. Best of all, there are no children (although I'd love to see BG 2004 reintroduce Muffet 2.0, the animatronic "daggit" -- not enough shows have comedy animals).
And Battlestar Galactica isn't the only example of hugely involving television. Lost, Arrested Devlopment, and 24, even Life On Mars and Footballers Wives from the UK, require the viewer to pay attention; the gun shown in the first season may not go off until the third season, but you'd better remember it. If Hollywood execs want to understand why their box office receipts are heading south, they should watch TV: How can their 2-hour movies compete with the richness of these shows? It's obvious why Peter Jackson needed 10 hours to tell The Lord of the Rings and 3 for King Kong. It's also why sequels have become so prevalent; you need the first film just to set up the back story and characters but the result is that these films feel so slow as the "plot proper" is squeezed into the final 20 minutes. Rare is the movie that can establish its characters in the first few minutes and then actually tell a story thereafter. (Compare Batman Begins with War of the Worlds to see this difference and Spielberg's story-telling abilities in action.)
MPAA: It's not downloading that's killing movies; it's television.
Those three little words
They infuriate. They frustrate. They cause you to scream and throw things.
"To be continued" -- probably the three most irritating words in the world. We watched the final part of the first half of season 2 of Battlestar Galactica on Wednesday evening. It was tense, exciting stuff. [SPOILER ALERT!] Crazy Admiral Cain had just decided to execute two of Adama's officers, who'd killed a Cain-authorized Cylon interrogator who was about to anally rape Boomer, a Cylon carrying the human/Cylon hybrid baby of one of the officers threatened with execution (keep up at the back there; this is important stuff). In retaliation, Adama had launched a strike force against the Pegasus, so that he could "get his men back". And . . . fade to black, "to be continued". Argh! [/SPOILER ALERT]
This is why people download TV shows illegally. You're living in a country with a lousy TV broadcasting service -- 30 channels and nothing to watch, an inability to schedule programs properly or even show them in the right order -- you know the episodes you want are out there, and you're going to buy the box set when it's available but you want to see what happens on Galactica NOW so BitComet starts looking pretty damn attractive. The Internet has given us the ability to get what we want pretty much when we want it -- never mind when the network operators, distributors, and producers want you to have it. I'm still resistant to watching TV on download -- I've gotten used to seeing all our "stories" via the projector, so a laptop keyboard just doesn't cut the mustard -- but it's tempting. Very, very tempting.
To be continued . . .
"To be continued" -- probably the three most irritating words in the world. We watched the final part of the first half of season 2 of Battlestar Galactica on Wednesday evening. It was tense, exciting stuff. [SPOILER ALERT!] Crazy Admiral Cain had just decided to execute two of Adama's officers, who'd killed a Cain-authorized Cylon interrogator who was about to anally rape Boomer, a Cylon carrying the human/Cylon hybrid baby of one of the officers threatened with execution (keep up at the back there; this is important stuff). In retaliation, Adama had launched a strike force against the Pegasus, so that he could "get his men back". And . . . fade to black, "to be continued". Argh! [/SPOILER ALERT]
This is why people download TV shows illegally. You're living in a country with a lousy TV broadcasting service -- 30 channels and nothing to watch, an inability to schedule programs properly or even show them in the right order -- you know the episodes you want are out there, and you're going to buy the box set when it's available but you want to see what happens on Galactica NOW so BitComet starts looking pretty damn attractive. The Internet has given us the ability to get what we want pretty much when we want it -- never mind when the network operators, distributors, and producers want you to have it. I'm still resistant to watching TV on download -- I've gotten used to seeing all our "stories" via the projector, so a laptop keyboard just doesn't cut the mustard -- but it's tempting. Very, very tempting.
To be continued . . .
Saturday, February 25, 2006
A stew from a land down under
I got home last night to discover that dinner had already been made. As befitted the extremely cold weather, it was a thick, warming, and hearty Australian bean and kale stew -- so hearty, in fact, that had it been a person, it would have slapped you on the back, bought you a pint, and then spent a couple of hours telling you all about the local huntin', shootin', and fishin'. After another large bowl for lunch, there are now 2 bags of it in the freezer, ready for any cold days in the future. Good stuff.
Things I actually like about living in the Netherlands, Part III
My first “proper” job (as opposed to my paper round and 2-year, illegal stint as a cinema usher) involved compiling a database of bridges for Norfolk County Council. This was back in 1989; Excel was unheard of and computer storage consisted of backing everything up on a tape streamer at the end of each day and sending it off to a bunker so that it was protected in the event of a nuclear attack. I spent my days looking through huge tomes and transferring the information contained therein into my database: bridge type, material, parish, number of spans, owner etc. At one point, I knew more about pipe drains and marsh culverts in Terrington St Clement than anyone else alive. And there was the excitement of my first business trip – off to Ipswich to inspect Suffolk County Council’s fancy new bridges database! Ah, the excitement . . .
Since then, I’ve been fascinated by bridges and have tried to include viewings of key structures on most of my vacations (I’m very excited about visiting San Francisco, obviously). And the Netherlands is full of them: 18th century “magere” (skinny) bridges over major rivers, hump-back canal bridges decorated with strings of lights, and modern, harp-like bridges that seem to float above the flat Dutch countryside. Best of all, though, is the road bridge near my office. It rises and falls several times each hour to allow the massive transport barges through on their way to the IJ. It carries tram tracks and wires that disconnect and reconnect smoothly and impressively. And it usually contains half a dozen pigeons that calmly perch on the underside of the bridge and enjoy the ride up and down. I don’t even mind waiting for it on my way to lunch, happy to watch such hypnotic poetry in motion. It’s a beautiful piece of urban engineering, one that I would be proud to catalogue in a database.
Since then, I’ve been fascinated by bridges and have tried to include viewings of key structures on most of my vacations (I’m very excited about visiting San Francisco, obviously). And the Netherlands is full of them: 18th century “magere” (skinny) bridges over major rivers, hump-back canal bridges decorated with strings of lights, and modern, harp-like bridges that seem to float above the flat Dutch countryside. Best of all, though, is the road bridge near my office. It rises and falls several times each hour to allow the massive transport barges through on their way to the IJ. It carries tram tracks and wires that disconnect and reconnect smoothly and impressively. And it usually contains half a dozen pigeons that calmly perch on the underside of the bridge and enjoy the ride up and down. I don’t even mind waiting for it on my way to lunch, happy to watch such hypnotic poetry in motion. It’s a beautiful piece of urban engineering, one that I would be proud to catalogue in a database.
Friday, February 24, 2006
It was the best of days . . .
How was today?
Pros:
The sun is shining.
I had a delightful lunch with fellow blogger Beth.
I got some great pictures of the bridges near work.
I had lots of work to do, so the day passed quickly.
It’s nearly home time!
I don’t have to go to the gym this evening, as I went last night.
Cons:
It's bloody cold, and the wind is strong and straight from Siberia.
The women at the table next to us smoked.
I saw a woman expectorate aggressively in the street. (Ew!)
I had lots of work to do, so had less time to read the Interweb.
The pro’s edge it: It's been a good day!
Pros:
The sun is shining.
I had a delightful lunch with fellow blogger Beth.
I got some great pictures of the bridges near work.
I had lots of work to do, so the day passed quickly.
It’s nearly home time!
I don’t have to go to the gym this evening, as I went last night.
Cons:
It's bloody cold, and the wind is strong and straight from Siberia.
The women at the table next to us smoked.
I saw a woman expectorate aggressively in the street. (Ew!)
I had lots of work to do, so had less time to read the Interweb.
The pro’s edge it: It's been a good day!
Thursday, February 23, 2006
Voodoo lady
I come home from work and think about the people who've pissed me off during the day while I'm removing and inserting the knives. One day, it might just work . . .
Beanz meanz Heinz
Another day, another lunch-time decision: Will it be a broodje met kaas from the sandwich shop, vegetarian Indonesian takeout, or a salad from the supermarket? What's this? The familiar blue-label of a can of baked beans, hiding in my desk drawer? Excellent -- beans on toast it is!
Whenever I head down to the kitchen to heat up my beans in the office microwave, I am aware that I'm confirming the national stereotype of the English: We have a lousy national cuisine. Anyone who visits on a high-school exchange programme gets egg, chips and beans or beans on toast for dinner -- and complains about it for the next 30 years. But beans on toast is the perfect lunch. High in fibre, low in fat, two sources of secondary protein (if you have it on wholemeal toast), and even a small amount of vitamin C in the tomato sauce. It's cheap, warming, easy to prepare when you're limited to just a microwave and toaster, and fills you up with slow-burning carbs. A bit of grated cheese on top makes the always-fabulous cheesey beans, and I've recently discovered that a thin layer of peanut butter on the toast adds a savoury depth to the dish. Lekker!
So, altogether now:
Beans beans are good for the heart
Beans beans make you fart
The more you fart, the better you feel
So let's have beans with every meal!
Whenever I head down to the kitchen to heat up my beans in the office microwave, I am aware that I'm confirming the national stereotype of the English: We have a lousy national cuisine. Anyone who visits on a high-school exchange programme gets egg, chips and beans or beans on toast for dinner -- and complains about it for the next 30 years. But beans on toast is the perfect lunch. High in fibre, low in fat, two sources of secondary protein (if you have it on wholemeal toast), and even a small amount of vitamin C in the tomato sauce. It's cheap, warming, easy to prepare when you're limited to just a microwave and toaster, and fills you up with slow-burning carbs. A bit of grated cheese on top makes the always-fabulous cheesey beans, and I've recently discovered that a thin layer of peanut butter on the toast adds a savoury depth to the dish. Lekker!
So, altogether now:
Beans beans are good for the heart
Beans beans make you fart
The more you fart, the better you feel
So let's have beans with every meal!
Wednesday, February 22, 2006
At the library
"When light is green, place book in scanner."
Does this mean:
a) When light is red, place book in scanner and then observe, confusedly, while the book is rejected from the scanner?
b) As above, but with added huffing and puffing and jabbing of book back into scanner?
c) Place the book in the scanner when the light is green?
I had no idea there were so many functionally illiterate, red/green color-blind library-card holders in Amsterdam.
Does this mean:
a) When light is red, place book in scanner and then observe, confusedly, while the book is rejected from the scanner?
b) As above, but with added huffing and puffing and jabbing of book back into scanner?
c) Place the book in the scanner when the light is green?
I had no idea there were so many functionally illiterate, red/green color-blind library-card holders in Amsterdam.
Tuesday, February 21, 2006
The 2006 Philosophical Debate
If a blog post doesn't get any comments, can it truly be said to exist?
My mobile phone phobia
Actually, I don’t think my inability to use a mobile phone is a phobia. And it’s not even an inability to use a mobile phone -- on occasion. I can make calls and send SMSes and play Snake -– and that’s about it. I can’t remember my number and don’t know how to retrieve voicemails, take photos, or change my ring tone. I rarely remember to carry my phone with me – or if I do, to turn it on. It’s simply not part of my mental, pre-exit checklist: Door keys, bike keys, gloves, hat, rain pants, purse, door keys (again), bike lights, and gum. No phone. I am constantly amazed by the fact that every Cloggie cycles past me each morning with their phone clamped to their ear with one, umbrella/child/dog/laptop case held firmly in the other, chatting away as if their life depended on it. Who are they talking to and what could they possibly have to talk about so animatedly at 8.30 in the morning?
This can cause problems. Saturday night, for example, we were due to meet another couple for dinner at a local Belgian restaurant. Off we trot at 8, dressed up in our finery (ok, clean clothes), and sat at the bar in the restaurant waiting for our friends to arrive. At 8.15, it suddenly occurred to me that they only had my mobile phone number and, as usual, I had not turned it on all day and had left it at home. At 8.20, a waitress approached us and announced, amused, that there was a phone call for us: Sure enough, Jo was sick, a message had been left on my voicemail, but we hadn’t responded so they’d phoned to check we knew. Doh! Embarrassment and groveling apologies all round.
Why am I incapable of remembering the damn thing? Perhaps it’s because of my initial delay in getting one. I refused to buy one in London, partly out of a reluctance to enter a mobile phone shop, and partly due to taking a perverse delight in making people turn up on time for appointments, rather than calling to say that they’d be late. I waited another 18 months in Amsterdam, figuring that there were very few people I wanted to call or be called by. I’ve never needed a phone for work – indeed, the ability to remain uncontactable by colleagues out of office hours was a huge incentive to be mobile-free. Waiting until after I was 30 clearly meant that it was too late for me to change my habits: I am not and never will be an instinctive mobile phone carrier, in the same way that it is now too late for me to develop natural grace (either physically or under fire) or a liking for olives and wine.
Amusingly -– nay, ironically -- I now have two mobiles: one for Amsterdam and one for London, as I found that I only made calls on my Dutch phone when I was in London, and Vodafone was charging me a fortune for this. If I’m only going to use my phone occasionally, I don’t want to overpay for the privilege. How “goedkoop” of me –- perhaps some Dutch attitudes are rubbing off on me, after all [shudder].
This can cause problems. Saturday night, for example, we were due to meet another couple for dinner at a local Belgian restaurant. Off we trot at 8, dressed up in our finery (ok, clean clothes), and sat at the bar in the restaurant waiting for our friends to arrive. At 8.15, it suddenly occurred to me that they only had my mobile phone number and, as usual, I had not turned it on all day and had left it at home. At 8.20, a waitress approached us and announced, amused, that there was a phone call for us: Sure enough, Jo was sick, a message had been left on my voicemail, but we hadn’t responded so they’d phoned to check we knew. Doh! Embarrassment and groveling apologies all round.
Why am I incapable of remembering the damn thing? Perhaps it’s because of my initial delay in getting one. I refused to buy one in London, partly out of a reluctance to enter a mobile phone shop, and partly due to taking a perverse delight in making people turn up on time for appointments, rather than calling to say that they’d be late. I waited another 18 months in Amsterdam, figuring that there were very few people I wanted to call or be called by. I’ve never needed a phone for work – indeed, the ability to remain uncontactable by colleagues out of office hours was a huge incentive to be mobile-free. Waiting until after I was 30 clearly meant that it was too late for me to change my habits: I am not and never will be an instinctive mobile phone carrier, in the same way that it is now too late for me to develop natural grace (either physically or under fire) or a liking for olives and wine.
Amusingly -– nay, ironically -- I now have two mobiles: one for Amsterdam and one for London, as I found that I only made calls on my Dutch phone when I was in London, and Vodafone was charging me a fortune for this. If I’m only going to use my phone occasionally, I don’t want to overpay for the privilege. How “goedkoop” of me –- perhaps some Dutch attitudes are rubbing off on me, after all [shudder].
"Not Dudley Moore -- DEMI Moore!"*
How come I spend 10 minutes each morning blow-drying my exceptionally straight hair so that it curls under at the ends and yet within an hour, it has started to curl up -- making me look like an entrant in the Mary Tyler Moore Lookie-Likie Contest? But if I try to curl it up, it just hangs straight with sticky-out bits? WHY?
I must have offended the hair gods in an earlier life.
* Any guesses as to why this is an apt title?
I must have offended the hair gods in an earlier life.
* Any guesses as to why this is an apt title?
Monday, February 20, 2006
Scratchy towels
I like old, thinning, rough towels more than super-soft new ones. They're more absorbent and with better drying power, but how do you turn fluffy new towels into sandpaper-like ones? Other than by waiting 20 years, I mean. And I don't have time for that; I want scratchy towels now!
I thought about this a lot when I was swimming this morning before work. That's swimming. At 8 a.m. On a Monday morning. I rock.
ETA: That was a really dull post. But nothing irritating happened today. Clearly, suffering is necessary for great art (or mildly entertaining blog entries).
I thought about this a lot when I was swimming this morning before work. That's swimming. At 8 a.m. On a Monday morning. I rock.
ETA: That was a really dull post. But nothing irritating happened today. Clearly, suffering is necessary for great art (or mildly entertaining blog entries).
Sunday, February 19, 2006
Subarashii!
Tonight's dinner consisted of 12 different dishes (if you include the rice):
Braised salmon
Braised mushrooms
Miso cucumber
Soy carrots
Wakame stir-fry
Sweet potatoes
Broccoli and sugar snap stir-fry
Salted salmon
Miso cod
Soy sauce egg
Rice with sesame seeds
Fried green peppers
None of the dishes were difficult to make; the hardest part was timing it so that everything was ready at more or less the same time. Luckily, most of the dishes taste pretty good warm or even cold, as one would expect from recipes designed for bento boxes.
It certainly felt healthy, although I wonder about the amount of sugar and salt used.( Japanese women might not get fat or old, but I bet they get dental cavities.) But there was no dairy and relatively little in the way of carbs, so we promptly followed this up with a big tub of chocolate midnight cookies ice-cream. And that's why the Norfolk Dumpling will get fat!
Random musings on a Sunday morning
1. When it comes to genre fiction, the average murder/detective story is of a higher standard than the average chick-lit novel.
2. The earlier I wake up on a Sunday, the more baking I do -- hence the apple nut cake I'm just about to take out of the oven, and the cheese/sesame bread that's proving above said oven by 10.40 am.
3. I have apparently developed the ability to fall asleep to the sound of PJ playing TimeSplitters: Future Perfect on the Xbox in the bedroom -- and to remain asleep, despite him not using headphones or turning the sound down.
4. No. 3 represents the acme of perfection in terms of girlfriend behavior.
5. Multi-course restaurants are the way forward for someone who always wants to try a bit of everything on the menu. Cases in point: Restaurant Aura (Copenhagen) and Lieve (Amsterdam). Fine, fine food!
6. Trying to take funky photos of the outside of your building at 11.30 at night after a couple of vodkas (or, in PJ's case, 1 G&T, 1 large glass of wine, and 8 1/2 glasses of wine,courtesy of Lieve) WILL result in you getting dogshit on your shoes.
2. The earlier I wake up on a Sunday, the more baking I do -- hence the apple nut cake I'm just about to take out of the oven, and the cheese/sesame bread that's proving above said oven by 10.40 am.
3. I have apparently developed the ability to fall asleep to the sound of PJ playing TimeSplitters: Future Perfect on the Xbox in the bedroom -- and to remain asleep, despite him not using headphones or turning the sound down.
4. No. 3 represents the acme of perfection in terms of girlfriend behavior.
5. Multi-course restaurants are the way forward for someone who always wants to try a bit of everything on the menu. Cases in point: Restaurant Aura (Copenhagen) and Lieve (Amsterdam). Fine, fine food!
6. Trying to take funky photos of the outside of your building at 11.30 at night after a couple of vodkas (or, in PJ's case, 1 G&T, 1 large glass of wine, and 8 1/2 glasses of wine,courtesy of Lieve) WILL result in you getting dogshit on your shoes.
Saturday, February 18, 2006
Things I actually like about the Netherlands, Part II
As I looked out of my window this morning, I noticed that one of the apartments across the canal has installed new blinds (bear with me, there is a point to this); the deep shade of teal contrasts nicely with the deep-brown bricks and cream window frames and gable decoration (no really, the point's coming up soon). It caught my eye not just because of the unusual color combo, but largely because window treatments of any variety are rarely seen in Amsterdam. Wherever you go, apartments luxuriate in the curious gaze of passers-by, those living opposite, and the tourist barges that ply their trade on our waterways. Apparently, this openess has two causes: 1) it's a way for the otherwise reserved (ha!) Dutch to demonstrate their wealth without actually flauting it in a terribly nouveau riche/American way; and 2) the Calvinist belief that enjoyment of soft furnishings condemns you to eternal damnation -- something, I think, we can all get behind.
This absence of curtaining is fantastic for someone who is both as nosy and as interested in "ordinary" design and interior decorating as me(there's my point!). In my student days, I enjoyed wandering round Summertown, a well-to-do Oxford neighbourhood, gazing in at the basement kitchens and book-stuffed living rooms as dusk fell and lights were turned on. But the English felt no compunction at closing their curtains to my stalker-esque stare, relishing, in fact, the privacy afforded by several metres of John Lewis' finest material. Amsterdam rewards my gaze, revels in it, nay encourages me to admire the many plants, unusual light fittings, and kitty cats that fill each abode.
Even better than the canal houses are the apartment blocks in areas like Oud West. If you enter one and head to the back, you are confronted with a huge expanse of gardens, enclosed on all sides by buildings. Each building has windows, balconies, roof terraces, all alive with light and human activity -- Rear Window come to life. (I've yet to see anyone being bumped off but I live in hope.) It's better than television, or at least Dutch TV -- but that's a complaint for another post.
And, I must confess, we've gone native. Although we have curtains, we rarely close them, preferring to see and be seen by our neighbours. You forget about them remarkably quickly; strolling scantily clad around the front room with nary a thought. "But surely the people across the canal can't see in? It's too far!" Well, perhaps -- although at one dinner party, one of our British guests exclaimed in scandalized tones "OMG! There's a woman in the apartment opposite taking her kit off" and all eyes swivelled in that direction. Oh well, modesty is clearly an over-rated virtue in these parts, and I don't care.
This absence of curtaining is fantastic for someone who is both as nosy and as interested in "ordinary" design and interior decorating as me(there's my point!). In my student days, I enjoyed wandering round Summertown, a well-to-do Oxford neighbourhood, gazing in at the basement kitchens and book-stuffed living rooms as dusk fell and lights were turned on. But the English felt no compunction at closing their curtains to my stalker-esque stare, relishing, in fact, the privacy afforded by several metres of John Lewis' finest material. Amsterdam rewards my gaze, revels in it, nay encourages me to admire the many plants, unusual light fittings, and kitty cats that fill each abode.
Even better than the canal houses are the apartment blocks in areas like Oud West. If you enter one and head to the back, you are confronted with a huge expanse of gardens, enclosed on all sides by buildings. Each building has windows, balconies, roof terraces, all alive with light and human activity -- Rear Window come to life. (I've yet to see anyone being bumped off but I live in hope.) It's better than television, or at least Dutch TV -- but that's a complaint for another post.
And, I must confess, we've gone native. Although we have curtains, we rarely close them, preferring to see and be seen by our neighbours. You forget about them remarkably quickly; strolling scantily clad around the front room with nary a thought. "But surely the people across the canal can't see in? It's too far!" Well, perhaps -- although at one dinner party, one of our British guests exclaimed in scandalized tones "OMG! There's a woman in the apartment opposite taking her kit off" and all eyes swivelled in that direction. Oh well, modesty is clearly an over-rated virtue in these parts, and I don't care.
Solid as a rock
The Nintendo DS is a remarkable piece of engineering. Not only does it provide hours of dual-screen fun with its cute yet addictive games, but it is also built to withstand mistreatment at the hands of destructive children and clumsy adults alike. Last night, I knocked it off the edge of the bathroom sink onto the concrete floor below -- and nothing. Not a dent. Not a nick. Not a scratch. And the boys were a little frisky when I turned them on this morning, but I don't think that had anything to do with the fall.
PJ has generously road-tested the sturdiness of various game console controllers (and Wi-Fi routers, and DVDs) by throwing them at walls -- the walls usually came off worse, thanks to the cheap plasterboard the builders obviously used -- but has never got sufficiently stuck on a game to toss an Xbox or a PlayStation across the room. Yet. (Famous last words . . .) But somehow, I doubt they'd stand up as well as the DS did.
I heart Nintendo.
PJ has generously road-tested the sturdiness of various game console controllers (and Wi-Fi routers, and DVDs) by throwing them at walls -- the walls usually came off worse, thanks to the cheap plasterboard the builders obviously used -- but has never got sufficiently stuck on a game to toss an Xbox or a PlayStation across the room. Yet. (Famous last words . . .) But somehow, I doubt they'd stand up as well as the DS did.
I heart Nintendo.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)